HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - AC - 04/17/2014 Town of
Cohasset
Massachusetts
MEETING MINUTES
Town of Cohasset
Advisory Committee
TIME: April 17,2014
7:00pm - 9:10pm
PLACE: Cohasset Town Hall, Basement
ATTENDEES:
Advisory Committee Presenters
• Peter Pescatore, Chair • Chris Senior,Town Manager
• Bob Benson • Jack Keniley, Chairman of the Capital Budget
• Tanya Bodell Committee
• George Chamillard • Mary Gallagher, Director of Finance/Town
• Richard Fitzpatrick Accountant
• Lealand Jenkins
• Linda Mooney Selectmen
• Tom Reardon . Martha Gjesteby
• Nan Roth
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE DISCUSSED:
1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Peter Pescatore, Chair of the Advisory
Committee.
2. Article 10:Allocation of Funds for One-time Cost($50,000)-Chris Senior
The Chair reminded the Committee that they had already voted to approve the$100,000 allocation for the
special maintenance account in this article and needed to consider the remaining$50,000 Citistat
appropriation and recommendation for Article 10.
Per prior request by the Committee,the Town Manager presented a break-down of this$50,000 as follows:
• Phase 1:$1,000 for 5 months of involvement in the MPMP program involving two departments
(e.g., Police,Fire Department,and/or DPM and$15,000 for professional services(min 150 hours)
to develop baseline and metrics.
Meeting Minutes -: :`' Town of
April 17,2014 Cahsset
Page 2 °^ Massachusetts
• Phase 2:Continuation with the MPMP program(costs range from$2,000 to$50,000 depending
on level of service contracted),working with an outside service provider to further develop
benchmarks and measurements,and a Cohasset-based intern program staffed by graduate and
undergraduate interns to provide regular reports and specialized data as needed.
The ultimate objective is to tie what is being spent to the level of services being delivered by the Town. In
business, inefficiency and ineffectiveness results in the company going out of business;in government,it
can continue indefinitely.This helps to illuminate what the town is doing versus not doing,and provides a
separate,independent basis for recommendations.
Although no new head count is anticipated,the results of the program may result in a reconfiguration of
existing positions and staffing roles.
The Town Manager assured the committee that he would be coming back on a regular basis to report on the
progress of the program,the data being collected,and insights and committed to reporting on a regular
basis to the Advisory Committee and Board of Selectmen.
A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE$50,000 ALLOCATION UNDER ARTICLE 10 was moved by Bob
Benson and seconded by George Chamillard.Approved 9-0.
3. Article 9:Funds for Road Repair and Maintenance-Chris Senior
This article proposes to allocate $150,000 for road repairs and maintenance projects identified by the
Department of Public Works. An additional$209,000 is expected from the state for this purpose.
A MOTION TO RECOMMEND ARTICLE 9 was moved by Lee Jenkins and seconded by Bob Benson.
Approved 9-0.
4. Article 5:Supplemental Appropriations for FY2014- Mary Galla her
The end of year generally includes transfers of surpluses across accounts to cover deficits. This
year,the total expected deficit is$244,264.00,with the majority being Snow&Ice($111,374.00)
and Street Lights($35,000), resulting from a cold winter and previous anticipation that the Town
would own the street lights.
There is excess in certain accounts that can be transferred to cover these deficits, including finance
personnel,treasurer/collector,and transfer station. The shortfall of$85,000 would come from the
stabilization fund.
Discussion ensued as to whether the shortfall should be funded from overfunded insurance
premiums(6.1%overage)which is$160,000, or whether those premiums should go to OPEB. As
stabilization is to meet emergencies,and the snow and ice could be considered an emergency,the
stabilization fund would be appropriate.
Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes -: :`' Town of
April 17,2014 Cohasset
Page 3 Massachusetts
A MOTION TO RECOMMEND ARTICLE 5 was moved by Tom Reardon and seconded by Nan Roth.
Approved 9-0.
5. Article 7: Capital Improvements Budget-Jack Keniley and Mary Galla her
In general,the capital schedule seemed to be in order. Two key items at issue include:
• High school roof maintenance for$30,000
• Bus leases for$53,000(to be corrected to $75,000 on the Town Meeting floor)
Roof maintenance is an operating budget line item and should be included in the FY15 Special
Maintenance budget. However,there is precedent and examples in this capital budget(e.g.,one-
on-one and Town Hall Restoration pre-capital project site work and study appropriate costs)where
an expense that is tied to a larger capital project has come out of the capital accounts.
The appropriate accounting for leasing school buses is more complex. The schools have a choice
about buying or leasing school buses. If purchased,they need to be maintained and,when the
useful life is ended,sold or otherwise disposed of. If owned,the cost would come out of capital
accounts. Other towns do put leases into capital plans funded with cash; not bond proceeds.At
issue is whether the lease should be similarly treated or come out of the operating budget. Using
capital stabilization money for operations sets a bad precedent. Expected net savings to the town
of moving from ownership to leasing buses is$100,000 per year.
Jack Keniley promised to work with Mary to think through the appropriate accounting treatment
and return to the Advisory Committee with a recommendation.
6. Article 22:Amendments to Cohasset By-laws
Article 26: Petitioned Article-Town of Cohasset Governance Committee
There are now two articles in the warrant concerning proposed changes to the Cohasset By-laws
tied to recommendations by the Governance Committee:
1) Article 26:The original citizen's petition to modify the by-laws;and
2) Article 22:An amended version of the citizen's petition modified and submitted by the Board of
Selectmen
A representative from the Governance Commission was not in attendance at the Advisory
Committee meeting. Therefore, no additional insight as to the Governance Commission's
recommendation could be discerned.
Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes -: :`' Town of
April 17,2014 Cahasset
Page 4 °^ Massachusetts
The Governance Committee is going to meet on the morning of April 231d to review the two articles
and make a recommendation.The Advisory Committee agreed to defer its vote until the next
meeting,which will be informed by the deliberations of the Governance Committee.
A MOTION TO DEFER THE VOTE ON ARTICLE 22 AND 26 was moved by Tanya Bodell and seconded
by Tom Reardon.Approved 9-0.
7. Overall Town Budget
Having reviewed the department budgets in detail,the Advisory Committee turned to the overall
budget.
This budget consumes the entirety of the projected uplift in revenues,establishes a higher base
that will continue going forward, and could result in the need for an override next year. It was
viewed as a fundamental mistake to spend the entirety of the$1.2 million increase in funds in the
operating budget.
Furthermore,the process by which this budget was created implies a manipulation of the system
that sets a bad precedent. The original budget in September assumed a $682,000 increase and
everyone initially proposed a budget that would have fit into their obligations. That increased in
November to$802,000 and then again in December to$1.3 million, at which point it was
disclosed to the newspaper.The final budget included a $1.2 million increase.
The town is facing systematic constraints both internally and externally. Internal structures
surrounding personnel have created 5%to 9%annual cost increases. External, macroeconomic
forces tied to housing turnover, economic conditions,and housing market values have increased
expectations and the number of children attending the schools,stressing the town's ability to
provide services.These structural issues should be identified and addressed.
Structural problems warrant a systematic look and a coherent approach to addressing the long-
term sustainability of the town. That said,turning down this budget is a declaration of war strategy
that could undermine confidence in department heads. The Town Manager indicated that it would
"cut his legs off from under him"and result in a credibility issue just as he assumes office and is
trying to address these issues. Although the strategy of sending a message to create a sustainable
solution is appropriate,the tactic could be detrimental.
If the Committee does vote against the budget, it is not required to indicate what should be
removed or recommend a different level. However,failing to do so could weaken the message
intended by a vote against the budget. Regardless of the vote,the presentation from the Advisory
Committee should let it be known that this budget has serious implications,will limit our ability to
give anyone raises next year,and will limit potential outcomes of the union contract negotiations,
Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes -: :`' Town of
April 17,2014 Cahsset
Page 5 °^ Massachusetts
as well as requiring an override next year. In other words, approving this budget has implications
for everyone's future.
A potential recommendation is to reduce the budget by$300,000 - a 1 percent reduction. There
does not seem to be stress in terms of spending as money is available to repurpose for other uses
at the end of each year. The rest could be put into the general stabilization fund. The broader
problem of personnel,cost-of-living increases,step promotions, unions and contracts would not be
addressed.
Disapproval of the budget is not a step that anyone would like to take. But, as ombudsmen for the
town, it is this Committee's fiduciary duty to take a stand. The only way to take a reduced budget to
town meeting would be to have a unanimous vote. Such a vote, however, could be symbolic as the
budget could still pass. Each person needs to do what they think is the right thing and let the town
citizens decide what they want to do.
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE TOWN BUDGET AS SUBMITTED was moved by Tanya Bodell and
seconded by Tom Reardon. Failed 4-5.
Peter Pescatore will present both positions, per decision last week. Tom Reardon will draft the
position supporting the vote to approve the budget.
8. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4/3/2014
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES OFAPRIL 3, 2014 was moved by Linda Mooney
and seconded by Bob Benson. Approved 7-0-2(abstentions)
9. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4/8/2014
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MEETING MINUTES OFAPRIL 8, 2014 was moved by Nan Roth and
seconded by Peter Pescatore. Approved 7-0-2(abstentions)
10. Scheduled Meetings
Next meeting:
• Wednesday,April 23, 2014 at 7:00 pm
• Town Meeting: Monday,April 28,2014 at 7:00 pm
Please arrive at Town Meeting 10 minutes in advance.
11. Farewell and ThankYou -Tom Reardon
Tom Reardon indicated that this could be his final meeting on the Advisory Committee as his
second term was ending. He expressed a deep pleasure at being involved in the Committee and a
heartfelt thanks to the other committee members.
Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes -: :`' Town of
April 17,2014 Cahasset
Page 6 Massachusetts
12. Motion to Adjourn:
A MOTION TOADIOURNwas made by Tom Reardon and seconded by Bob Benson. Approved 9-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Tanya Bodell, Rotating Secretary
Advisory Committee