Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - PB - 11/19/2014 Planning Board Meeting APPROVED MINUTES 1 of 2 November 19,2014 COHASSET PLANNING BOARD MINUTES DATE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2014 TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: COHASSET TOWN HALL—BASEMENT MEETING ROOM 41 HIGHLAND AVENUE, COHASSET,MA 02025 Board Members Present: Stuart W. Ivimey, Chairman Clark H. Brewer,Vice Chairman Charles A. Samuelson, Clerk Michael Dickey Brian Frazier,Associate Member Board Members Absent: David Drinan Recording Secretary Present: Jo-Ann M. Pilczak, Planning Board Administrator Meeting called to order at: 7:08 P.M. 7:08 P.M. WAYNE SAWCHUK—INFORMAL DISCUSSION—VBD PROJECT Property redevelopment at 35-39 and 45 R So. Main St. - retail on first floor with residential above (to be built as condos but might be apt. rentals) -will be built to conform to VBD regulations. Considering underground parking to provide more open space. Board-underground parking is a good idea. Advised Sawchuk to put in sidewalk on parking lot side of property—Town goal is to install sidewalks along entire parking lot. As planned, average unit size will be 1500 sq.ft. —some units will be 750 sq.ft. and some will be greater than 1500 sq.ft. Asked if Board can provide the flexibility to allow that. Ivimey-Board is in middle of deliberating on 8 James Lane(also in VBD)and will be seeking opinions on such issues as unit size. Until 8 James Lane deliberation is completed, Board cannot give guidance on size question. Ivimey reminded Sawchuk to be sure to locate brook and make sure it lies in easement—on 8 Jame Lane/2 Pleasant St.property, brook was not within easement. Targeting a February filing. 7:15 P.M. 130 FOREST AVENUE—FORM A APPL.—APPL./OWNER: ROGER&ANN POMPEO In attendance to represent application: Dr. Roger Pompeo Materials and documents submitted,utilized at this meeting (On file in Planning Board Office • Form A—ANR Application and Planning Board Statement of Litigation Policy, date stamped: 11/12/14 • Plan of Land,prepared by Outback Engineering Inc., dated: 11/11/14 Health Agent had advised Pompeo to install a common septic system for los 3,4,5,E - this suggestion did not make sense to Pompeo or his engineer. They determined it would be better to swap small rectangles of land between these lots 4 and 5 to allow the septic system for each home to be on the individual lots 4A and 5A. No other changes from the earlier plan in terms of driveway locations etc. - only changing borders of these two lots slightly to allow for individual septic systems on the appropriate lots. Ivimey asked Town Counsel if ANR can be endorsed if prior ANR is in appeal. Town Counsel - standard of review for an ANR is very limited - frontage is the only criteria. MOTION: By Member Brewer to endorse the plan as shown SECOND: Member Samuelson VOTE: 4—0 MOTION CARRIES 7:30 P.M. 71, 83 AND 85 SO. MAIN ST., RED LION INN — VILLAGE BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. APPL: CARR, LYNCH& SANDELL In attendance to represent application: Attorney Charles Humphreys; Gerd Ordleheide Brewer: suggested hiring a consultant Planner to review other aspects of the project and help minimize impacts and suggest mitigations. This would bring planning expertise, broader scope of issues to address and is appropriate for a project this size and scale with this kind of impact on the Village in terms of livability and mitigation. This type of consultant is not unlike the Board's consultant engineer hiring traffic and acoustic experts for peer review. Planning Board Meeting APPROVED MINUTES 2 of 2 November 19,2014 Humphreys: • Believes it is the Planning Board's job to determine legislative act that they are operating under. • Resents the idea of a planner coming up with a new concept of what the VBD bylaw intends — that is an abdication of the Planning Board's responsibility. • Consultant's responsibility is only to give advice,does not take any of Board's responsibility to make decisions. • The consultant's costs on this project are extraordinary and the current consulting engineer has a very broad brush with respect to making suggestions on this project. • The obligation is on the applicant to provide proper engineering, drainage, public safety, traffic etc. and make sure project is safe, convenient, protects the public health, will not be a nuisance or create noise etc. It is the applicant's job to provide the Board with their consultants' information. • He would not object to reviews of their submittals if the budget can be limited and costs can be controlled—he wants the Board to be cost and time conscious and does not want to see the project reinvented. • He would agree to$5000.00 • Will be submitting traffic and sound reports—if there are simple inquiries that cannot be resolved, they can talk about getting additional review. Brewer: Planner will be a peer reviewer and provide industry standards for mitigation Modezelewski: • Has gotten 2 proposals on the planning aspect which include time and materials. One is from a Planner on Cape Cod - $2000 for initial review. The other is from a large firm that consults for towns - $7500 but negotiable if there is an overlap in review areas. • He does not see any way to not have peer review of traffic and noise reports Humphreys: Cape person would be good—Cape has similar issues as Cohasset in large and small scale projects. Brewer: Wants Modzelewski to get a 3rd quote from a smaller firm—should provide a mid-range quote. MOTION: By Member Brewer to continue the public hearing to January 7,2015 at 7:30 PM with all new documents submitted by December 12,2014 SECOND: Member Dickey VOTE: 4-0 MOTION CARRIES ADMINISTRATION - VOTE TO APPROVE NOVEMBER 12, 2014 MEETING MINUTES MOTION: By Member Brewer to approve the November 12,2014 minutes SECOND: Member Dickey VOTE: 4—0 MOTION CARRIES - VOTE TO APPROVE PAYROLL FOR PERIOD ENDING NOVEMBER 16, 2014 MOTION: By Member Brewer to approve the payroll for period ending November 16,2014 SECOND: Member Dickey VOTE: 4—0 MOTION CARRIES SET JAN.,FEB., MARCH,2015 MEETING DATES - Jan. 7 &21; Feb. 11 &25; March 11 & 25 • PUBLIC COMMENT (5 MINUTES MAXIMUM) - none • TOPICS NOT REASONABLY ANTICIPATED BY THE CHAIR 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING Brewer noted that MAPC is having a meeting on November 20—Brewer wants to apply for grant for the EDC to piggyback the Rt. 3A corridor study. MOTION: By Member Brewer to adjourn at 8:15 P.M. SECOND: Member Dickey VOTE: 4 -0 MOTION CARRIES NEXT MEETING: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10,2014 AT 7:00 P.M. MINUTES APPROVED: CHARLES A. SAMUELSON, CLERK DATE: DECEMBER 10,2015